I enjoyed Mark Belling filling in for Rush today as he discussed Liberalism endorsing the most ridiculous of causes and positions. As the name of my Townhall blog, Liberal Logic ... an Oxymoron implies, I would suggest that the flaw is not in the inability of a Liberal to debate an issue but rather the substance of Liberal positions.

I find that the Liberal position is the most simplistic, obvious, superficial, emotional and wrong answer to an issue viewed from a static perspective.

In contrast when an issue is considered in depth and secondary, tertiary and quaduciary implications of a solution are viewed from a dynamic perspective, the Conservative position is always the result.

This concept also explains many things about which I’ve heard much head scratching such as:

1)      Why Conservatives have many answers but a singular direction while Liberals speak from the same predictable failed laundry list.

2)      Why Talk Radio is Conservative and successful by discussing the many pros and cons while Liberal attempts at preaching their dogma is a commercial failure.

3)      Why the Education establishment is Liberal because their mind set is to “Profess” a set of absolutes instead of exploring new logical conclusions.

4)      Why abortion is a Liberal sacrament because it solves the mother’s immediate problem but doesn't consider what the kid might think, potential emotional problems for the mother, the sanctity of life or religious thought.

5)      Why the consequential aspects of tax reduction are beyond the comprehension of a Liberal. That would require a reach beyond the simplistic.

6)      Why Liberalism is a religion comprised of a predigested dogma that one can sign onto without the need and effort of thought.

Liberal Logic is an Oxymoron.  

Fly@DumbLibs.com